We carry no DMA builds for Delta Force, and that was a deliberate call. In the January 2026 ban wave the developer counted 1394 DMA cheat users, which came to 72% of every violation recorded on desktop, and among high-rank offenders roughly 70% were running kernel-level exploits. The wave landed squarely on the category that the community treats as untouchable.
What works for this game right now, and what it costs, sits on the cheats for Delta Force page: every listing shows its status and its subscription periods. Everything below we looked at on season Reorientation, which shipped on September 8 together with The Mog and the reworked Layali Grove. The anticheat has not changed: ACE by Tencent, kernel level, driver ACE-BASE.sys active in the system at all times.
Why the January wave hit DMA so hard
The ratio in those numbers matters more than the absolute count. There are far fewer DMA owners in the player base than people running ordinary private software: you need a board, a second computer and the patience to deal with firmware. And they still accounted for almost three quarters of everything the anticheat caught on PC during the wave. The category that should have hidden from the statistics better than any other, going by the "there is nothing to scan" logic, came out on top of the report.
The G.T.I. Security summaries we rely on show the same thing broken down by rank: the higher the rank of a punished account, the better the odds that hardware or a driver sat behind it. That is the reverse of what usually gets sold alongside a DMA board. The seller's logic sounds convincing enough: no foreign process runs on the gaming machine, so there is nothing to scan. Trouble is, process scanning is one layer of the defense, and nowhere near the main one.
How hardware memory reading is put together
An FPGA board goes into a PCIe slot and reads the gaming computer's RAM directly, skipping the operating system. Structure parsing, ESP drawing and all the logic live on a second computer that has nothing to do with the game. On the machine running Delta Force no foreign process starts and no foreign driver loads. The hardware stopped being exotic a long time ago, and boards sometimes go for under 200 dollars.
The scheme works technically, and we are not arguing with that. In another game we do stock it, more on that below. The question is what exactly it protects you from. Hardware reading strips the software traces on the gaming PC side. Everything ACE does beyond that stays exactly where it was.
What ACE looks at besides the process list
Kernel level is not a marketing line in the description here. ACE-BASE.sys gets into the system before the game and on equal footing with it, so the anticheat has several sources of information at once, and they do not depend on each other. Software signs are processes, drivers, attempts to read memory from inside the system. Next comes the hardware fingerprint: processor identifiers, GPU data, storage serial numbers. On top of that sits the read on how an account behaves in matches. Last on the list are reports from live players in the same lobby, and buyers rarely think about those at all.
DMA removes only the first of those sources. The hardware fingerprint is collected from the very machine whose slot holds the board, and the list of devices on the PCIe bus reads from kernel level the same way everything else does. Even when the specific board goes unrecognized, the hardware fingerprint stays tied to the machine: take a ban and you lose the computer, not the account. How that gets sorted out in practice we covered in our piece on hardware bans and spoofers, and the same ACE logic in another Tencent title we showed in the Arena Breakout breakdown.
Behavior in a match shows without any drivers
The clearest scenario in this game is Mandelbrick. A squad picks up the cargo, carries it to the Decoding Site and holds the point for four minutes, and the squad's position is revealed to the whole map the entire time. For those four minutes half the lobby is watching you, and watching closely, because everyone is after the same thing. If the crosshair snaps onto heads at a uniform speed with no reaction delay, that is visible from someone else's screen rather than in anticheat logs. Reports follow, and the account review starts from those.
Hardware memory reading hides the code, but it does not hide the player. The difference sounds like nitpicking until you look at the January wave numbers, where high-rank accounts got punished more often than the rest. The higher the rank, the more the people around you can tell a rehearsed trajectory from a live hand, and the more often they look at you on purpose.
The penalty here runs ten years
Delta Force hands out ten-year bans for cheating, and that flips the whole risk arithmetic. In a game that bans for a week, a hardware kit reads as a bet: if you avoid detection, great, and if you do not, you sit the ban out. Here the bet is placed against a term that will outlive the current season and the game's own relevance. On how the penalty works and what counts as a violation we have a separate article built on G.T.I. Security summaries.
The DMA investment adds up like any other: the board, the second machine, firmware for a specific anticheat, hours of setup. And all of it goes up against a ten-year term in a game where wave statistics point at this exact category. The numbers did not add up for us, which is why no such listing ever appeared in the Delta Force section.
We do stock DMA for ARC Raiders, and that is no contradiction
The distinction is honest: different game, different anticheat, different cost of a mistake. In our DMA breakdown for ARC Raiders we say plainly that a kit pays off in a narrow scenario, namely an account with a lot of progress, months of regular play and a second computer already standing at home. There is no universal recommendation even there: that same article lists the maps where a kit gives you almost nothing.
In Delta Force not one of those conditions falls on the side of the hardware route. The penalty term is an order of magnitude longer, the anticheat works at kernel level and ties the ban to your hardware, and fresh wave statistics point at this category of software. We would rather not stock a product whose disclaimer would run longer than its description.
If someone offers you DMA for this game
Ask about the January numbers. A sane answer sounds like "here are our terms, and here is what we do not guarantee". A promise of total invulnerability after a wave in which DMA produced 72% of the violations recorded on PC means one of two things: the seller does not follow the game, or is counting on you not following it. The second question is just as useful: what happens to your machine after a ban, and who pays for changing the fingerprint.
What people run for Delta Force instead of DMA
Since we do not offer the hardware route, it makes sense to show what covers the same jobs. Not one listing below is sold with a promise of invulnerability, and each card carries its status as of the current date. The choice comes down to what worries you more: behavior in a match, the history of your hardware, or extra functions sitting in the menu at all.
- The behavioural detection layer worries you most: GHOST with its own Humanize block. Inside are Jitter, Deadzone, a Reaction Min and Max pair plus a Max Speed limiter, which is to say settings aimed exactly at what your lobby neighbours see. It runs $6 a day and $47 a month, Steam client only. Full menu walkthrough in the GHOST review.
- This machine has already taken a ban: ANCIENT, the only listing in this game's catalog where the spoofer and OBS streamproof come inside the subscription. It runs $4 a day and $40 a month. ACE checks hardware before the account, so buying the fingerprint change separately is not needed here, details in the ANCIENT review.
- You want the smallest footprint: GHOST CHAMS at $3.5 a day. There is no aimbot whatsoever, just player highlighting and radar, so the build has few places tied to game structures, and after patches it comes back online sooner than full menus do. What is inside is written up in the chams review.
- Havoc Warfare is your main mode: FECURITY with vehicle highlighting that nobody else in this game's catalog offers. It runs $6 a day and $75 a month, and you will have to get into the firmware: Secure Boot and TPM off, BIOS switched to UEFI mode, system drive partitioned as GPT. Full requirements in the FECURITY review.
A separate case is hardware already banned with no wish to change the build you are used to. Then the spoofer is bought as its own listing in the HWID spoofer section, and it works on more than just this game. Another three Delta Force listings are in rework right now, BTG, CROOKED and DULLWAVE, so it is worth rereading the status on the product card before you buy.
The current picture for the game sits on the Delta Force cheats → page: price per period, undetected or Updating status, our reliability rating and buyer reviews. We rebuild the list after every major patch, because ACE updates along with the game and some builds go back for checking. We promise permanent invulnerability on none of these listings, and the status on a card refers to the moment of purchase.
If it is not clear which option suits your mode and your hardware history, ask us directly: Telegram (200+ members) and Discord (637+ members).
Common questions about DMA and detection in Delta Force
Does the ForgeCheats catalog have DMA cheats for Delta Force?
No, and we do not plan to add them. The reason is the January wave statistics, where DMA accounted for 72% of the violations recorded on desktop, and the ban term: ten years is not a price we are willing to stake on a hardware kit. Every live listing for this game is software, and each card carries its current status.
Why is DMA called invulnerable if whole waves of it get caught?
Because invulnerability in those promises is measured by a single sign, whether a foreign process runs on the gaming machine. It genuinely does not. But ACE collects a hardware fingerprint, watches how an account behaves in matches and receives reports from live players, and hardware memory reading does not touch those layers at all.
Can ACE identify the DMA board itself?
The ACE-BASE.sys driver runs at kernel level and sees devices on the PCIe bus, so a board sitting in a slot is not invisible by definition. We will not claim which signs the anticheat uses in any specific build, but assuming the PCIe bus is closed off to it is not a safe place to start.
So what should you run for Delta Force?
Depends on what you are more afraid of. Against the behavioural layer there is the Humanize block in GHOST, against a hardware ban the built-in spoofer in ANCIENT, and the smallest footprint is chams with no aimbot. Comparing periods and statuses is easier straight on the Delta Force cheats page, where it all sits in one table.
Will a spoofer save you if the ban already happened?
Changing the fingerprint solves access from a banned machine, but it does not undo the penalty on the account itself. A new profile on the same hardware inherits the block, because ACE checks hardware before the account, and this is where a spoofer becomes mandatory. In our Delta Force catalog it is built into ANCIENT only, every other build needs it bought as a separate listing.
